: Characters like Shar (who uses they/them pronouns) and Ruthie (who is openly trans) exist in a world where their identities aren't constantly questioned or treated as "teachable moments" for a straight audience. 2. Fearless Storytelling with Real Stakes
The 2022 series tackles this by centering a truly diverse cast, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans individuals, allowing for a broader spectrum of queer life to be portrayed.
Before discussing how to make it better, we must diagnose what went wrong with the last attempt. The 2022 Queer as Folk was not a bad show; it was a gentle show. It featured a nightclub shooting in the first episode (a nod to Pulse), but afterward, it fell into a rhythm of therapy-speak, conflict resolution, and softness. queer as folk new series better
: Characters like Ruthie (a trans woman) and Shar (a non-binary parent) explore complexities beyond just the transition process.
By trading the narrow, nostalgic lens of the past for a messy, inclusive, and fiercely authentic present, the new Queer as Folk didn't just reboot a franchise—it perfected its core mission. : Characters like Shar (who uses they/them pronouns)
When it was announced that Queer as Folk —the iconic queer drama that originated in the UK and was famously adapted by Showtime in the early 2000s—was getting a 2022 reboot on Peacock, skepticism was high. Could a new iteration recapture the electrifying joy, raw messiness, and groundbreaking nature of the original?
3. Complicated, Unlikable, and Wonderfully Flawed Characters Before discussing how to make it better, we
The 2023–2024 revival of Queer as Folk (henceforth QAF-new) aims to recontextualize a landmark queer text for a changed cultural moment. Whether it is “better” depends on the criteria used: fidelity to the original, cultural relevance, representational breadth, narrative ambition, and artistic execution. This essay evaluates QAF-new along those dimensions and argues that while the revival succeeds in updating and expanding representation, it is not unambiguously superior to the original; rather, it functions as a complementary project that reflects contemporary queer politics, media economics, and audience expectations.
This is precisely what makes it feel so authentic. The queer experience is not neat or easily digestible, and a show that tries to present it as such would be a betrayal of the franchise's punk-rock, confrontational origins. The new Queer as Folk understands that the best way to honor the groundbreaking spirit of the original is not to replicate its formula, but to shatter its limitations. The show's performances are raw and committed, its sex scenes are both horny and heartfelt, and its willingness to tackle uncomfortable subjects is a testament to an all-queer writers' room and a cast of LGBTQ talent playing LGBTQ roles.
A new series can be better than the original because we have 20 more years of history, culture, and technology to draw from. We have trans stories to tell, economic collapses to critique, and a new wave of puritanism (from both the right and the left) to push against. The perfect Queer as Folk for this decade is out there, waiting for a network or streamer brave enough to fund it.
One of the biggest jokes about the original Queer as Folk is that Brian, an advertising executive, can afford a massive industrial loft in downtown Pittsburgh. In 2024, that’s laughable. A new series better than the original would ground itself in the economic collapse of queer urban spaces.